4.2. Ensuring applicants’ rights and obligations

 

ar2025 s412 applicants rights obligations icn

Discussions around the Pact rules on legal counselling in the administrative procedure and free legal assistance and representation in the appeal procedure continued in 2025. The EUAA developed a Practical Guide on Free Legal Counselling to support Member States in designing their national systems. In addition, the Comparative Overview of Legal Assistance and Representation in the Asylum Procedure presents the main legislative and policy developments in 2025, and summarises the most significant changes brought by the APR.

Czechia had already adopted the relevant legal provisions so a major change to its current system was not required, while draft laws related to legal assistance were pending in Germany and Sweden.184 In 2025, legal aid became limited to the first appeal instance in Latvia and must be covered by the applicant for a second appeal. Major changes were announced to the Dutch legal aid system.185 Furthermore, funding to provide legal assistance was cut for the Dutch Refugee Council, which is expected to increase pressure on the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA) staff in reception centres.186 The budget for legal aid in general, including for asylum seekers, was cut in Norway.187 Similarly, ECRE reported reduced access to legal aid in a number of countries, often due to financial cuts.188

There were only a few developments with the provision of information, as asylum authorities focused on updating material for the entry into application on the Pact. For example, the Swedish SMA and the Maltese International Protection Agency launched new websites, while the Portuguese AIMA created multilingual Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). In France, a legislative change allowed authorities to submit the asylum seekers’ guide to applicants electronically, instead of in hard copy.189 New information campaigns were launched on YouTube and WhatsApp, with dissuasive messages about Belgium’s strict asylum and migration policy, targeting applicants with small chances of protection, both in countries of origin and transit, in particular Cameroonian, Guinean and Afghan applicants in transit countries, and Moldovan applicants in the country of origin.190

Several countries launched tenders for interpretation services to reinforce their pool of interpreters in preparation to the Pact. The EUAA provided support with interpretation services through several of its operational plans, for example in Belgium,191 Cyprus,192 Greece,193 Ireland (for second instance),194 Malta195 and Romania.196 In order to reduce risks related to informal interpretation, people under 18 years were prohibited to act as interpreters in official communications with national authorities in all types of administrative procedures.197 The Finnish Immigration Service now requires all interpreters to complete an online training which provides a comprehensive overview of the requirements in asylum interviews and expectations for such interpreters.198