Publications

The analysis is intended primarily as a useful point of reference for members of courts and tribunals of EU+ countries concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection involving vulnerable applicants.

La principal finalidad de este análisis es servir como referencia útil para los miembros de
los órganos jurisdiccionales de los países UE+ competentes para conocer de apelaciones
o examinar resoluciones sobre solicitudes de protección internacional que afecten a

La présente analyse a essentiellement pour vocation de servir de point de référence utile aux membres des juridictions des pays de l’UE+ appelés à statuer sur des recours ou à réexaminer des décisions concernant des demandes de protection internationale relatives à des demandeurs vulnérables.

"L’analisi serve principalmente come punto di riferimento utile per i membri degli organi giudiziari dei paesi UE+ che si occupano di ricorsi o revisioni di decisioni riguardanti le domande di protezione internazionale che coinvolgono richiedenti vulnerabili."

Ši analizė visų pirma parengta kaip naudingas ES+ šalių teismų nariams, kurie nagrinėja apeliacinius skundus arba peržiūri sprendimus dėl tarptautinės apsaugos prašymų, susijusių su pažeidžiamais asmenimis, skirtas orientyras.

Analīze ir galvenokārt paredzēta kā noderīgs atsauces punkts ES+ valstu tiesu un tribunālu locekļiem, kuri izskata pārsūdzības vai izskata lēmumus par starptautiskās aizsardzības pieteikumiem no mazāk aizsargātām personām.

Niniejsza analiza ma służyć przede wszystkim jako użyteczny punkt odniesienia dla członków sądów i trybunałów państw UE+, którzy zajmują się rozpatrywaniem odwołań lub przeprowadzaniem kontroli decyzji w sprawie wniosków o udzielenie ochrony międzynarodowej dotyczących wnioskodawców wymagających

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

The judicial analysis is primarily intended for members of courts and tribunals of EU Member States concerned with hearing appeals or reviewing decisions on issues pertaining to the reception of applicants for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

The objective of this judicial analysis is to act as a tool for judges hearing detention cases.

The objective of this judicial analysis is to act as a tool for judges hearing detention cases.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This analysis is primarily intended for use by members of courts and tribunals of Member States concerned with hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications for international protection.

This compilation of jurisprudence is intended to be an accompanying resource to the judicial analysis and to provide courts and tribunals in Member States with a helpful aid to refer to when hearing appeals or conducting reviews of decisions on applications

Members of courts and tribunals are now faced with an almost overwhelming amount of information. The judicial practical guide provides an introduction to the use of country of origin information (COI) in international protection decisionmaking in Member States.

Members of courts and tribunals are now faced with an almost overwhelming amount of information. The judicial practical guide provides an introduction to the use of country of origin information (COI) in international protection decisionmaking in Member States.

Members of courts and tribunals are now faced with an almost overwhelming amount of information. The judicial practical guide provides an introduction to the use of country of origin information (COI) in international protection decisionmaking in Member States.

This judicial analysis scrutinises how, in the context of the CEAS, members of courts and tribunals should either review the evidence and credibility assessment undertaken by the determining authority (or court or tribunal of lower instance) or carry out evidence and credibility assessment themse

This analysis provides a general introduction setting out the legal framework and an overview of the rules of interpretation of the APD (recast).

This analysis provides a general introduction setting out the legal framework and an overview of the rules of interpretation of the APD (recast).

This analysis provides a general introduction setting out the legal framework and an overview of the rules of interpretation of the APD (recast).

This judicial analysis provides a general introduction setting out the objectives and structure of the analysis, an overview of the rules of interpretation of the recast Qualification Directive (QD (recast)) and a presentation of applications for international protection and the limited scope for

This judicial analysis is an introduction to the CEAS that assists courts and tribunals in carrying out their role and responsibilities in its implementation.

The judicial analysis of Article 15(c) QD (recast) is a helpful tool for the understanding of protection issues for courts and tribunals dealing with international protection cases.